- Type of paper
: Paper in journal
Title: An Attempt To Realize Conditions For Creative Production
In Non-Selected Groups
- Authors:
- Andriloviæ, Vladimir (76870)
- Miljkoviæ, Dubravka (141710)
Journal: Napredak
Number: 4
Volume: 133
Year: 1992
Pages: from 402 to 409
Number of references: 5
Language: hrvatski
Summary: Undergraduates (1. and 2. year) were "tested" on the
numerosityof "ideas" - use of walking-stick and match box. The time
fordivergent production varied; the objects were either only namedor named
and visually presented. With an increase of timeproduction of "ideas" grew
(not linearly). With short time-visualpresentation was not use full or even
appers to be harmful; withlong time-visual presentation becomes productive.
- Type of paper
: Paper in journal
Title: Method And Time For Presentation Of Stimulative Objects
And Variety Of Responses In Nonselected Groups Of Subjects
- Authors:
- Andriloviæ, Vladimir (76870)
- Miljkoviæ, Dubravka (141710)
Journal: Napredak
Number: 1
Volume: 134
Year: 1993
Pages: from 24 to 29
Number of references: 9
Language: hrvatski
Summary: 823 undergraduates (1. and 2. year) were "tested" on
numerosityand variety of "ideas" - use of walking-stick and matchbox.
Thetime for divergent productions was 2, 4, 6, 8 or 10 min. Theobjects were
either only named or named and visualy presented.With short time a greater
number of original ideas was given whenthe object was only named. With a
long presentation the number oforiginal ideas was almost double in the case
of visualpresentation of the object.
- Type of paper
: Paper in journal
Title: Divergent Production under Different Conditions and among
Different Age Groups
- Authors:
- Miljkoviæ, Dubravka (141710)
- Andriloviæ, Vladimir (76870)
Journal: Theleme
Number: 3 4
ISSN: 1019-7591
Volume: 38
Year: 1992
Pages: from 151 to 159
Number of references: 6
Language: hrvatski
Summary: A "fluency of ideas test" was applied to 853 subjects
(three agegroups) - use of walking-stick and match box. The time
fordivergent production was 2, 4, 6, 8 or 10 min. The objects wereeither
named or named and visualy presented. In the case ofminimal time allotment
the oldest age group (40-50 years) had thebest results; the longer the time
the better were the results ofthe youngest group (10 years), especially if
the objects wereonly given by name.
- Type of paper
: Paper in journal
Title: An experimental Attempt at Promoting Divergent Production
in a Group of Adults
- Authors:
- Andriloviæ, Vladimir (76870)
Journal: Theleme
Number: 1-4
ISSN: 1019-7591
Volume: 40
Year: 1994
Pages: from 41 to 47
Language: hrvatski
Summary: The divergent production test (ennumerating as many uses of
various familiar objects as possible) was carried out on a group of 114
subjects ranging from 26 to 26 to 49 years of age (almost all of them
university graduates). No difference was observed between men and women,
but there were significant differences betwen younger and older people (the
older were better). In the experimental attempt to promote divergent
production (between the initial and the final test an independent variable
was interpolated - 3 stimuli for divergent production lasting between 2 and
6 minutes in the experimental group) no diferences were observed between
the experimental and the control group (ranging between 30 and 49 years of
age). This is probably because older people generally do not benefit from
improvements in the production conditions, and also because such tests
place emphasis on life experience rather than on creative abilities.
- Type of paper
: Paper in journal
Title: Development of Creative Abilities at Various Age
- Authors:
- Andriloviæ, Vladimir (76870)
Journal: Napredak
Number: 2
Volume: 136
Year: 1995
Pages: from 133 to 138
Language: hrvatski
Summary: After an introductory discussion on the relation among
inherited brain capacities and their development into creative abilities
the author put the question why a sort of whales (known as the animals
having the brain inheritance very similar to human) are not as highly
creative as human beings. The answer these whales are not faced to real
problems. On the other hand, if the problems and other conditions for
development of divergent productions are performed, can it help a human
being at every age. It not, where is the limit? The results of empirical
investigations conducted by the author and his associates indicate - in
accordance with well known conclusions achieved earlier - that the limit
appears to be somewhere around 40 years of life (advancement is possible
also after forties but significantly less than earlier).
